Tag Archives: federal policy
Policy Formation and Analysis. 2022 Best
Today’s assignment focuses on policy formation and analysis. Scenario: You have been investigating the unintended negative consequences and effects, both local and global, of a particular state or federal policy on a given population.
Policy Formation and Analysis.
You have been investigating the unintended negative consequences and effects, both local and global, of a particular state or federal policy on a given population. (Social issue is the lack of respect in educational institutions for cultural diversity). Now, drawing on your readings and discussions, you must draft a proposed change to address those consequences. Reflect carefully on the global context and diversity attributes of the populations impacted and provide a rationale for change that stakeholders will support. To engage cross-system stakeholders, you must determine their positions on the existing policy and on your proposed change.
Policy Formation and Analysis.
You must also establish a process for evaluating the effectiveness of the change. Instructions Using your chosen state or federal policy, list the steps necessary to bring about a change in this policy for the benefit of your client population. Be sure to clearly identify the current policy and attach a copy of it as an appendix. To avoid unintended consequences, begin by considering the diversity of your client population and identify pertinent social justice issues. In a 5–7 page paper, complete the following: Analyze the intersectionality of attributes, including: Policy analysis for unintended consequences to impacted population based on diversity attributes and global context.
Policy Formation and Analysis.
A discussion of the specific steps necessary to avoid a negative impact on the vulnerable, including a rationale for your recommended changes to the policy, referencing the literature. Identify local, regional and, possibly, federal stakeholders. Examine their stakes in the change (whether for or against) and describe one strategy per stakeholder group for engaging them to support your proposed change. Describe how you would evaluate the effectiveness of your change on each level: micro, mezzo, and macro. Additional Requirements Follow current edition APA style and format throughout, including title and reference pages (not included in page count). Include 5–7 properly cited references from current, scholarly sources. Font: Times New Roman, 12 points. https://youtu.be/YPiy4OFMDtc
Additional Files
Types of research misconduct. 2022 Best
For this assignment we will explore different types of research Misconduct. Paper details: You must support your response with at least three new peer-reviewed articles, but can also cite any of the provided resources.
Types of research misconduct.
Paper details: You must support your response with at least three new peer-reviewed articles, but can also cite any of the provided resources. For this particular assignment, using McNamee, M. J., Olivier, S., & Wainwright, P. (2006). Research ethics in exercise, health and sports sciences. Routledge. Chapter 6 (pp. 108-129) Scientific misconduct: authorship, plagiarism and fraud, and blowing the whistle on it and Chapter 10 Research and society: is bad science ipso facto bad ethics? (pp. 181-195). , and the other provided sources and ones listed below, respond to the following topic: Discuss different types of research misconduct, and possible reasons that research misconduct occurs.
Types of research misconduct.
Differentiate between research misconduct, as defined by federal policy, and questionable research practices. Discuss responsible and ethical data management as it relates to your final assignment topic ((effect of daily vs. weekly check-ins for adherence in an online fitness & nutrition coaching program). Identify the considerations that must be made to ensure that your data management plan is comprehensive and follows ethical best practice standards based on the scholarly literature. Explain how participants’ anonymity, confidentiality and privacy will be protected prior to, during, and after the research data is collected.
Types of research misconduct.
The expectation for satisfactory work is 400 – 500 words per topic with at least 3 current peer reviewed references utilized. Textbooks, blogs, magazine or internet articles, book chapters, or special reports, do not count toward the peer-reviewed minimum. Connections to the peer reviewed references should be used throughout your writing with in-text citations and matching reference citations. Additional Resources: http://www.robertjsternberg.com/ethical-reasoning https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00733-5. Here are the places that you should be getting your peer-reviewed sources from: Journal of Ethics Journal of Medical Ethics Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Types of research misconduct.
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Ethics and International Affairs Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Public Health Ethics American Journal of Bioethics The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Journal of Information Ethics Journal of Applied Philosophy Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics Neuroethics Clinical Ethics Perspectives in Biology and Medicine Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Ethics and Information Technology. https://youtu.be/cINMxIreLMw
