Tag Archives: critical evaluation
Recommendations for Leaders 2022 Best
This assignment requires you to present your work in two sections. Section 1: Recommendations for Leaders and Managers (up to 1,500 words): Identify a topic from the module that has especially captured your attention and interest.
Recommendations for Leaders
Maximum Word Length: 3,000 words Unless otherwise specified, the word count is for the main body of the text and ignores the reference list. If you exceed the word length you will be penalized. Requirements: This assignment requires you to present your work in two sections. Section 1: Recommendations for Leaders and Managers (up to 1,500 words): Identify a topic from the module that has especially captured your attention and interest. Summaries in up to 500 words the practical implications of theory and research into this topic for leaders and managers in organizations who have a responsibility for the well-being of other employees.
Recommendations for Leaders
Then write up to 1,000 words that provide a succinct critical evaluation and summary of the research and theories that led you to the practical implications you identified (i.e., the practical implications in the first 500 words of this section). Section 2: Recommendations for Employees (up to 1,500 words): Identify a second topic from the module that has especially captured your attention and interest. This topic must be substantially and obviously different to the topic you selected for Section 1. Summaries in up to 500 words the practical implications of theory and research into this topic for employees seeking to use it to protect and / or enhance their own well-being.
Recommendations for Leaders
Then write up to 1,000 words that provide a succinct critical evaluation and summary of the research and theories that led you to the practical implications you have identified (i.e., the practical implications in the first 500 words of this section). Each Section must have two sub-headings: ‘Practical Implications’ and ‘Critical Review of Research and Theories’. This means your work will have four sub-headings in total. You may choose to add more sub-headings within each section if you feel this would enhance the presentation and clarity of your work.
Recommendations for Leaders
When preparing your assignment, it may help you to first focus your efforts on the Critical Reviews of Research and Theories: this should help you to identify the practical implications you describe under the first sub-heading of each Section. Note: the contents presented under the Practical Implications do not need to be re-iterated in the Critical Review of Research and Theories. https://youtu.be/D6IuI3TY1K0
Additional Files
Persistence of Gender Inequality – 2022 Best
This assignment involves carrying out a critical evaluation of ‘‘ Exploring the Persistence of Gender Inequality through Women’s Career Histories’’ article. Maximum word limit is 1800 words
Persistence of Gender Inequality
Examination Q & A. Paper details Now that you have read the article ‘‘‘You Just Had to Get on with It’: Exploring the Persistence of Gender Inequality through Women’s Career Histories’’ (see Appendix 1), answer the following questions. 1. You will be providing a critical evaluation of the introduction and literature review sections of the article. You should address the following questions in your critique.. Firstly, does the discussion provide a clear rationale for the study and engage widely and critically with other research in the field?
Justify your answer by providing examples from the article. Secondly, a well-written literature review is expected to locate the review in a methodological position. Can you determine the philosophical position followed by this study just by looking at the literature review section?
Persistence of Gender Inequality
In addition, justify your answer by giving examples from the article. (Maximum word limit: 1800 words) (40 marks) 2. Back to the problem statement of this paper, can you envision how the research would be articulated if the paradigm were to change to a different one (of your choice)? (Maximum word limit: 900 words) (20 marks). 3, If this article were to be a thesis, would the ethical discussion provided be satisfactory?
Also, are there any other elements/implications which should have been considered by the researchers? (Maximum word limit: 900 words) (20 marks) 4. Present and support your own point of view in response to the following statement: ‘Qualitative and quantitative researchers have different epistemological assumptions.’ (Maximum word limit: 900 words) (Total 20 marks) https://youtu.be/HJzZ3JUUI6s
