Tag Archives: concepts

Marx and Nietzsche’s theories 2022 Best

Marx and Nietzsche's theories

For this assignment we will how Marx and Nietzsche’s theories are depicted in the movie Parasite and what the movie adds to their theories. You must have access to the movie “Parasite” in order to refer to specific scenes and explain why and how these scenes portray Marx or Nietzsche’s theory and how can these scenes add to their theories/concepts

Marx and Nietzsche’s theories

Movie “Parasite” in the lens of Marx and Nietzsche. Paper details Paper goal: Show how Marx and Nietzsche’s theories are depicted in the movie Parasite and what the movie adds to their theories. Also what these theories/concepts can add to the movie “Parasite. Professor’s instructions, my paper’s topic, readings and page numbers needed for this assignment and grading info are all in the written “Final Project Instructions” file. The readings indicated in the “”Final Project Instructions” file can be found in the “Nietzsche Reader” file or the “Marx Reader file” (attached).

Marx and Nietzsche’s theories

You must have access to the movie “Parasite” in order to refer to specific scenes and explain why and how these scenes portray Marx or Nietzsche’s theory and how can these scenes add to their theories/concepts. Also what these theories/concepts can add to these scenes. I would prefer if you explained Marx and Nietzsche’s theories in your own words when relating them to the movie. The abstract may be really helpful to read as it will clarify what I planned for my arguments. Please use simple and clear language. Citations: MLA Format. https://youtu.be/46Qu0wdbwoo

Additional Files

Philosophy of Nursing 2022 Best

Philosophy of Nursing

This nursing paper aims to provide you with the opportunity to articulate your personal philosophy of nursing as it relates to your current nursing practice. The paper demonstrates critical inquiry, analysis, and synthesis. The paper is 8–10 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list.

Philosophy of Nursing

Paper instructions: Assignment 4: Philosophy of Nursing Scholarly Paper Purpose of Assignment This assignment aims to provide you with the opportunity to articulate your personal philosophy of nursing as it relates to your current nursing practice. We are looking for you to support your own personal philosophy by using scholarly references. There are no right or wrong answers when it comes to developing your personal philosophy, as long as you can back it up with credible literature. Assignment Guidelines Include a title page, introduction, and conclusion; do not include an abstract.

Philosophy of Nursing

Use a minimum of 5 scholarly references. Consider the following prompts or questions to help guide the content of your paper as you articulate your own philosophy. What are the key values and beliefs that are embedded in your philosophy of nursing? Describe the philosophy of practice in your work environment (current or former) and which concepts, theories, and values guide nursing practice in that workplace? How does your personal philosophy of nursing align with the values in your workplace? Provide at least one clear and specific example of a situation where your nursing practice was guided by your philosophy of nursing.

Philosophy of Nursing

Choose a  theory that you think fits best with your nursing practice or personal philosophy. How do these concepts and theories help you think about your nursing practice? Marking Criteria Content of Paper Each element of the assignment guidelines is addressed. The paper integrates material course references, and other scholarly sources including at least 5 peer-reviewed journals. The paper demonstrates critical inquiry, analysis, and synthesis. The paper is 8–10 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list. Scholarly Format of Paper Keep within the page limit (8-10 pages). Write clearly, using complete sentences and a scholarly tone. Include accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Adhere to APA current edition for formatting, citation(s) and reference(s). https://youtu.be/x7DE0GP5qGo

Additional Files

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder. 2022 Best

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

For this assignment we will focus on assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder. Many individuals seeking treatment meet the criteria for both mental health and substance-related disorders.

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

Paper details Week 8: Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.  Many individuals seeking treatment meet the criteria for both mental health and substance-related disorders. Regardless of whether you specialize in substance-related disorders, all advanced practice nurses should know their signs and symptoms and how to assess and diagnose them. There are assessment and screening tools available to clinicians, and a plethora of information can be obtained through the diagnostic interview. It takes time and experience to know what types of questions to ask to gain the most information, in addition to a basic knowledge of the substances and behaviors you are trying to assess.

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

It can be complicated to sort out substance use disorders from other mental health disorders, but most clients seeking treatment have comorbidities. This week, you apply DSM-5 substance use and addictive criteria as you formulate a diagnosis for a patient in a case study. Learning Objectives Students will: Apply concepts, theories, and principles related to patient interviewing, diagnostic reasoning, and recording patient information Formulate differential diagnoses using DSM-5 criteria for patients with substance-related and addictive disorders across the lifespan Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders An important consideration when working with patients is their cultural background.

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

Understanding an individual’s culture and personal experiences provides insight into who the person is and where he or she may progress in the future. Culture helps to establish a sense of identity, as well as to set values, behaviors, and purpose for individuals within a society. Culture may also contribute to a divide between specific interpretations of cultural behavior and societal norms. What one culture may deem as appropriate another culture may find inappropriate. As a result, it is important for advanced practice nurses to remain aware of cultural considerations and interpretations of behavior for diagnosis, especially with reference to substance-related disorders.

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

At the same time, PMHNPs must balance their professional and legal responsibilities for assessment and diagnosis with such cultural considerations and interpretations. For this Assignment, you will practice assessing and diagnosing a patient in a case study who is experiencing a substance-related or addictive disorder. With this and all cases, remember to consider the patient’s cultural background. To Prepare: Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. https://youtu.be/1FiGaR6XM2c

Diagnosing Patients with Addictive Disorder.

By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient. Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient. Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient. By Day 7 of Week 8 Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis.

Additional Files

Perspectives of wisdom. 2022 Best

Perspectives of wisdom.

For this assignment we will explore different perspectives of wisdom. I. Watch the 3 Bible Project videos from the “Wisdom Series” IN ORDER (they tell a story as you go from one to the other). Proverbs https://bibleproject.com/explore/video/wisdom-proverbs/

Perspectives of wisdom.

I. Watch the 3 Bible Project videos from the “Wisdom Series” IN ORDER (they tell a story as you go from one to the other). Proverbs https://bibleproject.com/explore/video/wisdom-proverbs/ Ecclesiastes https://bibleproject.com/explore/video/wisdom-ecclesiastes/ Job https://bibleproject.com/explore/video/wisdom-job/ II. FINAL ESSAY The final essay is worth 60 points (compared with 30 points for all other assignments) and is broken up into two main parts. In part 1, write a 300 word minimum summary of each of the 3 videos (300 words per video would make 900 words TOTAL in this section) in which you…

Perspectives of wisdom.

1) Capture the main ideas and key words from the video and 2) Summarize what each of them has to teach us about “living wisely”. In part 2, write a 700 word minimum application of the concepts from these videos to your own life by reflecting on the following questions. Explain and describe which of the three perspectives of WISDOM that you lean towards most? Why does that perspective resonate with you? Which of the Wisdom perspectives is the hardest for you to accept?

Perspectives of wisdom.

Why is it difficult for you? Based upon the videos, which areas of your life do you need to work on to learn how to better “live wisely” in the fear of the Lord. **ALL WORDS COMBINED (900 part 1, 700 part 2) SHOULD MAKE 1600 WORDS TOTAL FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT** Type your paper into a Word document and submit through Blackboard. Do not use any outside sources – only the content from the videos will be accepted as source material. https://youtu.be/DCvnGYIK9VQ

Additional Files

Quality program expansion. 2022 Best

Quality program expansion.

This assignment is a role play. You have been tasked by the CEO of your company to assess the need for a quality program expansion. Choose a company not used in previous weeks of the course.

Quality program expansion.

This assignment is a role play. You have been tasked by the CEO of your company to assess the need for a quality program expansion. Choose a company not used in previous weeks of the course. This company can have no formal quality program in place or a QA/QC program or any variation. You can choose to help them build out Big Q or add/ improve their small q. Be creative and showcase what you have learned. Write a 2,450- to 3,500-word paper that includes: A brief overview of this company’s product offering (manufacturing or service) Detailed description of why a quality program or change in their current program would benefit the company

Quality program expansion.

Explanation of how the Voice of the Customer and Voice of the Market would drive the program Description of how you would implement this quality program – lean six sigma related. Note: this is how you would roll it out based on the best practices you have learned in this course. A list of tools and metrics you would use to ensure success. Note: this is tools and metrics for the program itself. Explanation of how external quality organizations would aid in determining your company’s quality program. Choose one that you have found that will add value to the program after your implementation.

Quality program expansion.

Note: Make sure you support your paper with course concepts and illustrate your mastery of the concepts with real life examples from your company. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Reference for attached material files Foster, S. T. (2016). <i>Managing quality: Integrating the supply chain, 6/e</i> (6th ed.). Pearson Education. https://youtu.be/deAw_27UJbM

Additional Files

stress management plans 2022 Best

stress management plans

This assignment entails developing a personalized stress management plans that rely on the use of adaptive coping strategies to ensure personal health and well-being. SCENARIO You have been working as a nurse in the adult oncology unit for the past year.

stress management plans

The purpose of this task is to explore how self-advocacy, nursing ethics and professional accountability can be applied in clinical practice. Using the provided case scenario, you will be required to think about how ethical concepts can be used to make clinical decisions and explore the differences in personal and professional beliefs. You will develop personalized stress management plans that rely on the use of adaptive coping strategies to ensure personal health and well-being. SCENARIO You have been working as a nurse in the adult oncology unit for the past year. You have developed a close relationship with many of your patients, but Mr. Newcomb has a special place in your heart.

stress management plans

He has been diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer and has undergone aggressive chemotherapy. Each day his wife has come to the unit to be with her husband. They have been married for over 40 years and share a deep love. Mr. and Mrs. Newcomb have made the decision to no longer continue with treatment and have decided that hospice care is needed. Over the past few days, you have watched Mr. Newcomb’s health decline, and you can tell from your experience that he does not have much time left to live. Mr. Newcomb has been very open about discussing his death, and you have had the opportunity to learn about his life and the legacy he will leave behind.

stress management plans

While you are completing your rounds, you stop in Mr. Newcomb’s room to see how he is doing. You ask, “Is there anything else I can do for you?” Mr. Newcomb has rarely asked for anything, but today he has one request. Mr. Newcomb states, “Before I die, I would like to see my mistress one more time. Mrs. Newcomb is always here. Do you think you could tell her that I will be busy for a few hours tomorrow so I can make arrangements to see my mistress one more time?”

Reflect on the following questions before you begin working on this task: • What would you do in this scenario? • How can your knowledge of ethical principles be utilized to determine your response to Mr. Newcomb? • How would this affect you as a nurse and direct provider of care for Mr. Newcomb?

stress management plans

REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

stress management plans

A. Summarize how the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice apply to the scenario by doing the following: 1. Describe how you would respond to Mr. Newcomb’s request. 2. Evaluate how you applied the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice to the scenario. 3. Examine how personal beliefs and values influenced your response to the scenario. 4. Describe three strategies to promote self-care. B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. https://youtu.be/CGvjk7hgASQ

stress management plans

C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z RUBRIC

Additional Files

A philosophical question, 2022 Best

A philosophical question,

This assignment asks you to compare the thought of two philosophers on a philosophical question, and then position yourself personally in relation to this question based on the elements acquired in the comparison.

A philosophical question,

You will have to compare the thought of two philosophers on a philosophical question, and then position yourself personally in relation to this question based on the elements acquired in the comparison. The purpose of this document is to provide you with the essential tools to carry out this test. Formal structure of the comparative dissertation Introduction (a) The subject brought: introduction announcing the question (b) The subject asked: 1. Wording of the question 2. Brief description of the thesis of the two authors (c) The divided topic: announcement of the development plan Development (a) The report

A philosophical question,

1. Problematization 2. Presentation of the first thinker’s answer to the question 3. Presentation of the second thinker’s answer to the question (b) Benchmarking 1. Important similarities between the two philosophers 2. Important differences between the two philosophers (c) The position taken 1. Critical appreciation of philosophers’ conceptions 2. Presentation of your personal position: I. First argument II. Second argument Conclusion (a) Reminder of the position of the two authors and your personal position (b) Opening the text to further reflection or deepening The report

A philosophical question,

The purpose of the report is to accurately set out the concepts and arguments presented by philosophers that can help you provide a reasoned answer to the philosophical question you ask yourself in your text. In order to get off to a good start on your question, you must propose a problem, i.e. a presentation of the essential philosophical issues of your question. In other words, explain how you understand your question and why it is philosophically important. The report itself is a paragraph presenting a reasoned reformulation of the philosopher’s thought on the topic under discussion.

A philosophical question,

It consists in selecting and presenting the essential elements of each philosopher’s reflection on the question in such a way as to suggest a faithful reflection of their reflection. You will have to write two reporting paragraphs (one for each thinker). To properly prepare your account of each philosopher, follow these steps to prepare your plan: • Step #1 : Identify the relevant parts of the philosopher’s thinking in relation to your question. • Step #2: Identify important concepts related to the philosophical issue of your work. Make sure you understand the philosopher’s definition of it.

A philosophical question,

Step #3: Locate the philosopher’s reasoning on the issue you’re concerned about, and make sure you understand the scope of each of these events. • Step #4: Synthesize the relevant concepts and arguments you have uncovered so that the philosopher’s answer to your question is felt. Do not hesitate to use the technical vocabulary of the philosopher you are presenting. Benchmarking Comparative analysis consists of comparing the answers that each philosopher brings to the question that is the subject of your work in order to see what they have in common and what they differ in.   https://youtu.be/GDgxntmve0o

Additional Files

Analyzing gender themes and concepts – 2022 Best

Analyzing gender themes and concepts

This assignment involves analyzing gender themes and concepts of You Exist Too Much, Zaina Arafat. Compare the chapters of the book to the articles by applying the concepts from the readings to the chapters.

Analyzing gender themes and concepts

Paper details Analyze a couple of chapters out of the book using articles from the course. Compare the chapters of the book to the articles by applying the concepts from the readings to the chapters. Keep in mind that because they are different genres, it may be difficult to compare in a straightforward way—the articles have arguments whereas the book will have themes. But you can certainly discuss these in light of one another and compare the argument being made in an article to the way topic is portrayed in the chapter.

Analyzing gender themes and concepts

Pedagogical purpose: Novels provide a rich depth of characters, settings, and interactions that reflect the author’s assumptions about what the author thinks is or could be true in the world. This includes how gender is expressed, negotiated, contested, and structured. Analyzing a novel can help make abstract concepts concrete by taking what you have learned in class and applying those concepts and perspectives onto the book. Produce a creative and/or scholarly project about the gender themes in the book, connecting them to class concepts. IMPORTANT NOTE: None of these novels were written with gender as a scholarly concept in mind. Gender as a concept will be more or less present/obvious, depending on the book.

Analyzing gender themes and concepts

This assignment asks you to think about how gender is portrayed and enacted even when it is not the “subject” of the book. The final project should apply one or more course concepts to the novel you read and convey them to your audience in a creative or scholarly way. If you wish, you may write a paper with the same specifications as outlined in the film analysis assignment. Evaluation: Projects will be assessed as either A, B, C, or F. Below is a selection from the grading rubric. There may be other reasons for a particular grade not mentioned below and each example may not completely apply in all situations. https://youtu.be/Vv0HyrHB3uQ

Analyzing gender themes and concepts

A: Project shows that student engaged critically with the book, applied at least one course concept accurately and with depth, and clearly conveyed their ideas to the reader/listener/viewer. B: Project shows that student applied one or more class concepts at least at a surface level and conveyed their ideas in a way that could be understood by a reader/listener/viewer. C: Project covers the book but does not adequately incorporate any class concepts or does so inaccurately. Ideas are not clearly communicated. F: No project or project shows that student had not read the book.

Additional Files

Powered by WordPress