Tag Archives: charts
Waterfall and Agile methodologies 2022 Best
This assignment answers questions on waterfall and Agile methodologies of project management. Explores the implications and causes of scope creep and gold plating
Waterfall and Agile methodologies
Choose two of the following six questions and prepare a written paper answering those questions. Word count: 1675 – 2000. Roughly about 50% of the word count should be devoted to each question. Ensure the paper is your own, original, and individual work. We expect you will go over the course material and then, do some research before you prepare your essay. 100% of the text/content that you prepare must be your original work. Do use references and citations that are adequate. Ensure that you do NOT reuse material that others already prepared or compiled. I.e. this is NOT about looking up the work others have done before you and you preparing a summary or paraphrasing their analysis.
Waterfall and Agile methodologies
Include any tables, images, charts, appendices, and similar as needed, in order to help support your arguments. These do not count as part of the word count specified above. Feel free to bring actual business cases to support your argument. Either from publicly known projects or from your own experience. If you choose to do the latter, be sure to offer enough context for the reader to understand the type of project and its scope, and be detailed on offering why is a good example to illustrate your point. 1. Discuss some of the main differences between Waterfall and Agile project management methodologies.
Waterfall and Agile methodologies
Could you run any type of project using Agile methods? Support your answer with specific projects and business examples. 2. What are the implications and causes of scope creep and gold plating? How can this be avoided? Use referenced examples to support your answer. 3. What are the most common constraints that affect successful project performance, and how can project managers deal with these scenarios. Be specific in your answer -methods, techniques, frameworks- and, where possible, support your answer with referenced cases and examples. 4. Choose a well-recognized unsuccessful project. https://youtu.be/5RocT_OdQcA
Waterfall and Agile methodologies
Enumerate and examine its critical failures, from a quality management and/or stakeholder communications perspective. Be sure to provide references to support your answers. 5. “Project managers should always conduct an EV analysis since this is the most reliable and accurate method for project performance management.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement and why? Support your answer with referenced examples, where possible. 6. Make the case for a company to adopt the Decision trees/EMV methodology to evaluate their projects with its multiple scenarios. Why is this method useful? In which context should it be adopted? How would a company be better off using this method, than none? Any cons?
Additional Files
Project Scope Management. 2022 Best
This assignment involves writing a literature Review for Project Scope Management. The typical length of a paper for proceedings is 6-12 pages, including tables, charts, and references. The main body of the paper should be numbered in consecutive order
Project Scope Management.
Final paper (aggregation of all discussion board assignments): The final paper should be the final product of your work throughout the term and the results of your weekly discussions. The core content of the final paper is the results of your readings and the findings you have devised. It is okay to reuse some of your posts in your final paper as you see fit. At a minimum, in your Results and Discussion section of your final paper, try to address the following questions: · What are some of the possible answers to your questions? · What are some of the important findings you expect from your investigation?
Project Scope Management.
What is the practical significance of your predicted findings? · What is/are the contribution/s of your findings to what we know or do not know about your topic? Your submission should follow the format of a research paper and should be ready for sharing at a symposium, seminar, workshops, or conference. The typical length of a paper for proceedings is 6-12 pages, including tables, charts, and references. The main body of the paper should be numbered in consecutive order: ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION II. METHOD III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Project Scope Management.
IV. CONCLUSION REFERENCES Here is an example of a Literature Review research paper: Denicol, J., Davies, A., & Krystallis, I. (2020). What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819896113 (Links to an external site.) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/8756972819896113 (Links to an external site.) You can use this example as a reference to know how to design and write your final paper. https://youtu.be/VUUa5iU3Gwk
