This assignment involves writing a paper on human rights violation. The dissertation must provide a clear link to important and interesting business, strategic, managerial and economic applications.

Human Rights Violation.

The dissertation must provide a clear link to important and interesting business, strategic, managerial and economic applications. A range of approaches may be adopted, including the original analysis of existing secondary data but it is likely that most students will use a combination of published literature and primary research. The dissertation should be bound using comb binding and a dark blue cover. ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Each of the assessment categories is elaborated below in the form of a checklist of questions.

Human Rights Violation.

Please study the checklist of questions as you prepare relevant sections of your dissertation, and especially when you are editing the penultimate and final drafts of your dissertation. INTRODUCTION, CONTEXT, RESEARCH OBJECTIVES (10%) Is the research topic or problem clearly stated and shown to be worth investigating? Has appropriate background information been provided with special terms and concepts defined? Are the research objectives (research questions or hypotheses) clear, relevant, coherent and achievable? Do objectives etc. go beyond mere description ie. Do they involve explanation, comparison, criticism or evaluation?

Human Rights Violation.

LITERATURE REVIEW (25%) Has a comprehensive range of RELEVANT literature been used to discuss relevant concepts, models and theories? Are the sources used up to date, and of sufficient academic weight? Does the dissertation give evidence of a critical attitude towards source material? Are the key themes and issues surrounding the research questions clearly drawn from the literature? Have sources been acknowledged and cited fairly and properly, in accordance with the Harvard format? Is the References listing at the end of the dissertation complete and in the Harvard format?

Human Rights Violation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY (15%) Is there a clear rationale for the research design and methodology adopted? Are the research methods fully described and the advantages and disadvantages of chosen methods discussed? Are any constraints or limitations identified? Are the relevant research instruments (e.g. blank questionnaire, interview questions etc) included in the appendices? Are the research instruments well designed with all questions etc. relevant to research objectives? Are sampling methods described in detail? i.e. who the respondents are, how many there are and how they were selected?

Human Rights Violation.

Are data analysis methods discussed? Is there evidence of care and accuracy in the data collection process? Are reliability and validity issues addressed? Has the methodology been critically evaluated in retrospect? RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF FINDINGS (30%) Is all data presented relevant to aims and objectives? Is the analysis thorough and appropriate to the data collected? eg. FOR QUESTIONNAIRES Do the appendices contain a data matrix, and details of statistical analysis undertaken? Is statistical analysis correctly performed and interpreted?   https://youtu.be/Ntdk3gwYLec

Additional Files