This assignment asks you to compare the thought of two philosophers on a philosophical question, and then position yourself personally in relation to this question based on the elements acquired in the comparison.

A philosophical question,

You will have to compare the thought of two philosophers on a philosophical question, and then position yourself personally in relation to this question based on the elements acquired in the comparison. The purpose of this document is to provide you with the essential tools to carry out this test. Formal structure of the comparative dissertation Introduction (a) The subject brought: introduction announcing the question (b) The subject asked: 1. Wording of the question 2. Brief description of the thesis of the two authors (c) The divided topic: announcement of the development plan Development (a) The report

A philosophical question,

1. Problematization 2. Presentation of the first thinker’s answer to the question 3. Presentation of the second thinker’s answer to the question (b) Benchmarking 1. Important similarities between the two philosophers 2. Important differences between the two philosophers (c) The position taken 1. Critical appreciation of philosophers’ conceptions 2. Presentation of your personal position: I. First argument II. Second argument Conclusion (a) Reminder of the position of the two authors and your personal position (b) Opening the text to further reflection or deepening The report

A philosophical question,

The purpose of the report is to accurately set out the concepts and arguments presented by philosophers that can help you provide a reasoned answer to the philosophical question you ask yourself in your text. In order to get off to a good start on your question, you must propose a problem, i.e. a presentation of the essential philosophical issues of your question. In other words, explain how you understand your question and why it is philosophically important. The report itself is a paragraph presenting a reasoned reformulation of the philosopher’s thought on the topic under discussion.

A philosophical question,

It consists in selecting and presenting the essential elements of each philosopher’s reflection on the question in such a way as to suggest a faithful reflection of their reflection. You will have to write two reporting paragraphs (one for each thinker). To properly prepare your account of each philosopher, follow these steps to prepare your plan: • Step #1 : Identify the relevant parts of the philosopher’s thinking in relation to your question. • Step #2: Identify important concepts related to the philosophical issue of your work. Make sure you understand the philosopher’s definition of it.

A philosophical question,

Step #3: Locate the philosopher’s reasoning on the issue you’re concerned about, and make sure you understand the scope of each of these events. • Step #4: Synthesize the relevant concepts and arguments you have uncovered so that the philosopher’s answer to your question is felt. Do not hesitate to use the technical vocabulary of the philosopher you are presenting. Benchmarking Comparative analysis consists of comparing the answers that each philosopher brings to the question that is the subject of your work in order to see what they have in common and what they differ in.   https://youtu.be/GDgxntmve0o

Additional Files